Raid why use

I have spoken to some people about the size of hard drives available. Given that the MTBF is the same for the drives, the lower number of drives has a lower potential for a failure. The more drives you have, the more likely a failure. This ends up without a parody Drive involved which means a failure of one of any of the discs would result in the loss of all data in the raid array.

RAID 1 offers complete redundancy. With 2 drives, it will mirror all data to the other drive, with 3 drives, it will mirror to both the other drives. It will continue like that for as many drives as you put in.

Your space will be limited to your smallest drive in the RAID 1, no matter how many drives you have. Chances of losing data in a RAID 1 get increasingly lower the more drives you have, but it also makes it very expensive per GB. Hope that helps. I would like to know if it is possible somehow to install Windows 10 on Raid 0? If so, how would I proceed?

When prompted, you would then insert the disk with the driver on it. Most RAID manufacturers have an option to create the driver disk. However, if you have a HDD Raid controller card, or a raid controller built into your bios, then you can create the raid there. Then using the Drivers for the controller, you can install Windows.. Anyway, I think the dual drives in the enclosure are fine but power suddenly just cut off. My question is this: Can I take out the platters and put them in a dual dock 3.

Or is there a way to repair the power issue in the enclosure? It fired right up perfectly. Daniel Smith 4 drives of 3 Tb in raid 10 is 6 TB because the you combine 2 drives as raid 0 and the other 2 are used a mirror Those who work with large amounts of data should choose between raid 10 or 6 In my view today raid 5 is no longer a good solution because of bitrot..

However the most secure is in my view raid 6 till the grow beyond the max of raid 6 is reached and it looses its ability to proper restore the files.

Raid10 Am I right to be scared of mirroring? Is Raid10 failure along similar lines possible? Even a software raid should be telling you which drive is malfunctioning — at least Linux will flood error log with messages of failed drive. If you have 4 separate raid 5 arrays, would a hard drive failure in one of the arrays affect only the performance of the one array and the others would remain unaffected? Can anyone explain this? You have a file that is broken into 10 chunks, and those chunks must load into memory before you can use them.

So on one dish, your hard drive controller loads block 1, then block 2, then block 3… etc. In raid 0, it would load block 1 and 2 at the same time, then block 3 and 4. But if you lose a disk, you only have half your file. What you are recommending will not increase speeds by much, unless you are loading to files in separate folders. Thanks for beautifully explaining the types of RAID. I am a tech guy and was using RAID 5. Somehow, I had lost the data from it.

So, I asked the solution from my colleague and he advised me to use Stellar Phoenix raid recovery software. This works great for me. Stellar Phoenix is a scam company and this fake comment is just sock puppet marketing. Buyer Beware. Great post! When backing up data I always use the style strategy. But, more is always better. You opt for Dual mirror: so in that case, no need another drive for TM? If TM, then the drive is also need 3TB?

You can put other data on that partition but it apparently more common to use a separate partition. The mirrored drives protect your data against 1 disk failing. Accidental errors like incorrectly deleting a file or misplacing it or data corruption are more common and a bigger worry. That is why you use Time Machine for the data residing on the internal drive but of course the same also applies to the data that will be stored on those mirrored drives.

So in my opinion, the ideal setup is that the third drive on which you put your Time Machine data is also a 3GB drive, split into one partition for Time Machine and a second bigger partition on which you occasionally copy the main data stored on your mirrored drives. I know that adds to the cost but I like having a spare copy of data and I like having systems with disks that are all the same size.

Easier to resell afterwards, easier to repurpose as a 3-disk RAID set if your storage needs change over time. Also if I would like to use this ext for Time machine, do I need to partition as well? As have3 HD 3TB for data? I would personally opt for dual mirrored 3TB drives instead of 4x 1 TB. It is simpler, offers better performance, makes less noise and uses less power.

When you add a third disk for Time Machine you can still do it all with a 4-disk enclosure, instead of having to buy a more expensive 5-drive system. With 3 disks in use, you still hafe a spare slot if you want to expand storage in the future.

If you go for a NAS box its software takes care of making those mirrored drives appear as one partition. Check out YouTube videos on setting up a Synology, Qnap,… system — it is pretty straightforward.

One question. If we take RAID 5, what is pairity checksum features. If we have 4 disk and configured raid It will do stripping means fast data flow as data being distributed but what is pairity for? The parity is used for recovering data in case of drive failure. With RAID6 two disks can die simultaneously. More detailed descriptions of the way parity works can be found elsewhere on the web. This page is meant to give a general overview.

Having an extra offsite disk is a good idea. In many NAS enclosures it is a bit of a hassle to swap drives. Once something is clunky, you stop doing it after a while. Why not use a separate harddisk docking station for the off-site copy?

I am looking to install an external multiple bay NAS drive for home use. Approximately TB, keeping in mind performance and that I will be backing up all data on an external HDD stored in my safe. What would be the best RAID configuration to use? Thank You for any insight and information. What an excellent explanation of RAID….. Thank you so much. Hi, I have read your explanations about RAID configuration and it is very much informative with pictures. If I understand your first question correctly, you are wondering if you can use a smaller drive for parity compared to the other drives in the RAID set.

The hardware or software RAID controller determines if you can mix different sizes and types of drives. Many require all drives to have the same capacity.

Alternatively they use the capacity of the smallest drive across all of them. Please note that it is 6 gigabit per second, not 6 gigabyte per second. There is some overhead which means the fastest real transfer speed is around megabyte per second. A hard disk cannot reach that maximum speed, only SSDs are capable of doing that.

You should also keep in mind that if you copy files from one logical drive to another on the same HDD, your computer is reading from and writing to the same drive simultaneously. That also slows down the data transfer. To take advantage of Sata 3 speeds, you need both a Sata 3 drive and a Sata 3 controller. Also as noted, the 6 gigabit-per-second transfer rate specified for Sata 3 is only what the controller is capable of. A Sata 3 hard disk will never achieve a full 6Gb per second transfer rate, but it will be way faster than a Sata 2 drive.

SSDs will get you much closer than any hard drive, but no storage media will actually ever reach the maximum transfer rate of the controller. The type of data being transferred is a significant factor in this as well. Also the 6Gb per second Sata 3 transfer rate only applies to sequential reads, which are faster than random reads, particularly on rotating media. Write operations are much slower, as the media itself is the bottleneck. Can you please tell me what is the maximum size for one virtual disk under RAID 1.

What is the largest disk size it supports? I have a Gb and a gb drives If i RAID 0 with them will I get gb of space under one drive or will it be limit to gb being to lowest size of the two?

The storage space added to the array by each disk is limited to the size of the smallest one, which means this would be very unefficient. If your smallest drive is GB, then a raid 0 configuration would give you twice that amount, or GB. You can certainly do this. I would just get a second large disk though. HDDs are moving back to being cheap again.

Set aside the smaller disk for a backup drive and sync some important folders to it. The other disadvantage is that you cannot go back in time and recover a file you accidentally deleted two days ago. Previous Versions. I personally have two external disk enclosures and alternate back-ups of all data on these enclosures. One of them is stored at my parents house and during each visit I swap them out so I always have an off-site backup.

There are two disadvantages of just mirroring your data on additional internal disks: your backup is physically in the same location so if the PC gets stolen or there is a fire everything is gone. If you attach a separate box containing two or more drives to a computer and those drives are running in a RAID configuration, there is a circuit board in that box that handles the distribution of the data across the drives. That board has its own CPU: it is effectively a mini computer but it typically is called a hardware controller.

Most of it is in an alternate location 3tb and that is also spent so another external drive without a backup is being used. I am wondering if a mirrored 12 or 16 gb raid 1 drive is a good idea my current 4tb can be moved to the other locale giving me 7tb. I anticipate using at least 1TB in the next year and possibly more.

If I understand it correctly you currently have around 6 TB of data and you expect to add at least 1 TB each year. I am not familiar with the brands you mention. Have a look at Drobo as well — their RAID boxes seem to be pretty popular but there are dozens of alternatives on the market.

I would stay away from RAID with such a setup. RAID works best for drives with the same capacity and using the same type of controller.

If you want higher throughput remove the big drives from their external enclosure and put them internally on SATA 6. That is faster than most USB3 controllers.

Is it possible you can explain to me how to do the following or direct me to a tutorial? On the other hand, I have lost many hard drives and all the information from crashes. Mounting drives on Windows 7 is explained on this Microsoft page. I cannot give you a short and relevant description of how to do this, especially not without any knowledge of your setup. Once that is done, the RAID volume can be partionned and formatted from within the operating system.

If one drive goes down your data is protected because it's duplicated. In systems with three or more drives we recommend that you set the system to RAID 5. This RAID mode is good for business critical database management solutions that require maximum performance and high fault tolerance.

A system set to RAID 10 yields half the total capacity of all the drives in the array. Why is RAID used? Archive 09 November Why is my Hard Drive Making a Noise? Ransomware: How Many Businesses Pay? Tape Backups: Advantages and Disadvantages. Ransomware "the most immediate danger to UK businesses". Categories Cloud Storage 1. Computer Forensics 2. Data Recovery 5. Data Recovery Specialists News Data Security 9. Disaster Recovery 8. File Recovery 7. Hard Drive Data Recovery 7.

Hard Drive Recovery 8. Industry News 8. Mac Data Recovery 1. Mobile Phone Recovery 6. SD Card Data Recovery Software 1. SSD Data Recovery Tape Data Recovery Tutorials 5. USB Data Recovery 2. Viruses and Malware 8. Free Diagnosis "Our free hard drive data recovery evaluation service will tell you whether your data can be recovered, exactly how much it will cost and how long the data recovery will take. Listing Of Recoverable Files "Once in the laboratory, your media will undergo a comprehensive data recovery evaluation to determine the extent of the data loss.

Completing the Process "Should you choose to proceed, the data recovery process will be completed and the data will be safely stored on our servers. Established and Trusted "40 years experience in the data recovery industry chairing ISO and BSI standards, we have developed a reputation for excellence at a price that is affordable.